US Companies Hiring for ISO 42001 Skills, by Sector, Role and State

Last Updated October 14, 2026
companies-hiring-iso-42001-usa
Written by Latha Karthigaa
Summarize with AI

On this page

In the AI Training Skool AI Governance Pay Index, 65 named US employers cited ISO/IEC 42001 in 71 of 179 AI governance job postings (40%), collected from Indeed in early October 2026. Technology and software companies posted the most of these roles (26), followed by financial services (13) and professional services firms (13). Most were manager or analyst roles in GRC, risk and engineering teams.

ISO/IEC 42001 in US job postingsValue
Postings that name ISO/IEC 4200171 of 179 (40%)
Named employers behind those postings65 (one posting gave no employer name)
Largest sector (our classification)Technology, software and AI: 26 postings
Largest role familyGRC, compliance and AI governance: 21 postings
Most common levelManager, lead, principal or staff: 28 postings
Remote roles14 of 71 (20%), against 16% of all 179 postings
States with at least one posting21 states plus the District of Columbia
Postings that ask for an ISO/IEC 42001 credential by name3
Median advertised pay midpoint, 43 postings with pay$168,000

Source: AI Training Skool AI Governance Pay Index, US Indeed postings.

Which US Employers Name ISO/IEC 42001 in Job Postings?

ISO/IEC 42001 appears in postings from household names such as Bank of America, Cisco, Salesforce, Verizon and Palo Alto Networks, and from many smaller firms. The table lists 59 of the 65 named employers with the role each one posted and the month it was posted.

We left out six: three employers that sell compliance or risk software and three staffing agencies hiring for an unnamed client. The table also skips the posting with no employer name and a job board’s repost of the Verizon role already in the list. Postings close and change, so treat each row as a lead to check, not an open vacancy.

EmployerRole title in the postingLocationPostedSector (our classification)
AdobeSr Technology Compliance Product OwnerSan Jose, CASeptemberTechnology, software and AI
Aegis AIGRC EngineerNot statedOctoberTechnology, software and AI
Blue YonderStaff Security Analyst II (GRC)Dallas, TXAugustTechnology, software and AI
ButterflyMXGRC EngineerRemoteAugustTechnology, software and AI
CiscoStrategy and Planning Manager, Enterprise AI Programs and GovernanceResearch Triangle Park, NCOctoberTechnology, software and AI
CventSenior Analyst, Security Risk and Compliance (AI Risk Governance)Tysons Corner, VASeptemberTechnology, software and AI
DeepgramCompliance and Documentation LeadRemoteOctoberTechnology, software and AI
DoppelDirector, Governance, Risk and ComplianceNot statedSeptemberTechnology, software and AI
GitLabSenior Security Risk Engineer; Staff Security Governance Engineer, Policies and StandardsRemoteSeptember and OctoberTechnology, software and AI
GranicusGRC Automation EngineerRemoteAugustTechnology, software and AI
KlaviyoLead Security Compliance EngineerBoston, MASeptemberTechnology, software and AI
Medidata SolutionsPrivacy and RAI EngineerNew York, NYSeptemberTechnology, software and AI
MercorSecurity GRC LeadSan Francisco, CASeptemberTechnology, software and AI
Palo Alto NetworksPrincipal GRC Business EngineerSanta Clara, CAAugustTechnology, software and AI
ParloaSenior IS&T Governance PartnerNew York, NYAugustTechnology, software and AI
SalesforceTechnology Auditor, Internal AuditDallas, TXOctoberTechnology, software and AI
ServiceNow (Moveworks)Staff Security Engineer (Compliance)Mountain View, CAAugustTechnology, software and AI
SysdigTrust and Assurance LeadRemoteSeptemberTechnology, software and AI
TricentisDirector, Security Governance, Risk and ComplianceAustin, TXSeptemberTechnology, software and AI
VasionPrivacy and AI Governance AnalystLehi, UTAugustTechnology, software and AI
WrapbookGRC Principal, Data Privacy and SecurityRemoteSeptemberTechnology, software and AI
Bank of AmericaSr Data Architect, AI Controls, Governance and CapabilitiesCharlotte, NCSeptemberFinancial services and insurance
BankUnitedTechnology Risk, Cyber Governance and Third-Party Risk ManagerMiami Lakes, FLSeptemberFinancial services and insurance
DAI CompaniesSr Manager, Governance, Risk, Compliance and PrivacyPlano, TXAugustFinancial services and insurance
dv01Data Governance LeadNew York, NYSeptemberFinancial services and insurance
EnvestnetLead Security Governance Partner, AssuranceBerwyn, PASeptemberFinancial services and insurance
KapitusPrincipal Data and AI Governance ArchitectArlington, VASeptemberFinancial services and insurance
MizuhoAI Risk and Governance LeadNew York, NYSeptemberFinancial services and insurance
Moody’sVP, AI Risk ManagementNew York, NYSeptemberFinancial services and insurance
Navy Federal Credit UnionSenior Quantitative Risk Analyst (Internal Audit, Model and AI Governance)Pensacola, FLOctoberFinancial services and insurance
Rockefeller Capital ManagementAI Engineer, Controls and Capability EnablementHamilton Township, NJSeptemberFinancial services and insurance
T. Rowe PriceSenior Manager, Technology and Cyber Risk ManagementOwings Mills, MDSeptemberFinancial services and insurance
WesBanco BankSVP and Director of IT Governance, Cyber SecurityWheeling, WVSeptemberFinancial services and insurance
Arnall Golden GregoryInformation Governance SpecialistAtlanta, GASeptemberProfessional services
CroweFinancial Services AI Governance Consulting ManagerDenver, COSeptemberProfessional services
Cyber AdvisorsAI and Data Governance EngineerMaple Grove, MNSeptemberProfessional services
CyclotronSr. AI Governance Architect; AI and Data Governance EngineerRemoteOctoberProfessional services
DentsuAI Governance Analyst; AI Governance Engineer; AI Governance Concierge Service LeadNew York, NYSeptemberProfessional services
KrollManager, AI Assurance and Governance, Cyber AdvisoryNot statedAugustProfessional services
Mayer BrownManager, AI Security and RiskChicago, ILSeptemberProfessional services
OneMagnifySenior Lead, AI GovernanceRemoteSeptemberProfessional services
Aya HealthcareSr. GRC AnalystSan Diego, CASeptemberHealthcare and life sciences
Baylor GeneticsSr Mgr Third Party RiskNot statedSeptemberHealthcare and life sciences
Detego HealthInternal Enterprise Controls and Technology Assurance AuditorNot statedSeptemberHealthcare and life sciences
IntuitiveIT Sr Director, Compliance and Risk GovernanceSunnyvale, CAAugustHealthcare and life sciences
LabConnectHead of IT Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC)Johnson City, TNSeptemberHealthcare and life sciences
MiniMedSenior Principal Information Security Governance, Risk and Compliance AnalystNorthridge, CASeptemberHealthcare and life sciences
Hitachi High-Tech AmericaAI Data and Security Governance EngineerHillsboro, ORSeptemberIndustrial, energy, telecom and infrastructure
Johnson ControlsAssociate Director, Data Governance EnablementMilwaukee, WISeptemberIndustrial, energy, telecom and infrastructure
OceaneeringAI Governance InternHouston, TXSeptemberIndustrial, energy, telecom and infrastructure
VantageCybersecurity AI Risk and Governance Director, GlobalSterling, VASeptemberIndustrial, energy, telecom and infrastructure
VerizonPrincipal, Cybersecurity Audit, Risk and Governance Architect, AI and Emerging TechAshburn, VASeptemberIndustrial, energy, telecom and infrastructure
VictaulicSenior AI Risk AnalystPennsylvaniaOctoberIndustrial, energy, telecom and infrastructure
Carter’sGovernance, Risk and Compliance Manager (IT)Atlanta, GASeptemberConsumer, retail, media and real estate
LennarDirector, Assistant General Counsel, PrivacyMiami, FLAugustConsumer, retail, media and real estate
Sony Interactive EntertainmentResponsible AI and Governance Technical SpecialistSan Mateo, CASeptemberConsumer, retail, media and real estate
General Dynamics Mission SystemsSenior AI Governance and Risk SpecialistChantilly, VASeptemberGovernment, defense, education and international
Nova Southeastern UniversitySecurity Governance, Risk, and Compliance Manager (hybrid, Florida)FloridaSeptemberGovernment, defense, education and international
World Bank GroupSenior Digital Specialist, Trustworthy AI (with Cybersecurity)Washington, DCOctoberGovernment, defense, education and international

Source: AI Training Skool AI Governance Pay Index, 71 US Indeed postings that name ISO/IEC 42001. All posting months are in 2026. “Remote” follows the index rule: the posting’s location is Remote, or no city is given and the text says remote.

Only three employers posted more than one such role: Dentsu (three), and GitLab and Cyclotron (two each). Demand is spread thin across many employers, so a list of companies to watch beats waiting for one big hirer.

Of the Big Four accounting firms, only Deloitte appears in our sample, and neither of its two postings named ISO/IEC 42001. No posting in the 179 was for a chief AI officer.

ISO 42001 Hiring by Sector and Employer Type

Technology, software and AI companies posted 37% of the ISO/IEC 42001-naming roles in our data. Financial services and professional services followed with 18% each.

Sector (our classification)PostingsShare of 71EmployersExamples
Technology, software and AI2637%24Adobe, Cisco, GitLab, Palo Alto Networks, Salesforce
Financial services and insurance1318%13Bank of America, Mizuho, Moody’s, T. Rowe Price
Professional services (consulting, audit, law, agencies, staffing)1318%10Crowe, Kroll, Dentsu, Mayer Brown
Industrial, energy, telecom and infrastructure710%6Verizon, Johnson Controls, Vantage, Victaulic
Healthcare and life sciences68%6Intuitive, MiniMed, Baylor Genetics
Consumer, retail, media and real estate34%3Carter’s, Lennar, Sony Interactive Entertainment
Government, defense, education and international34%3General Dynamics Mission Systems, World Bank Group

Source: AI Training Skool classification of the 71 postings. Method: one sector per employer, by main business as stated in the posting’s company description. Software sold to a regulated industry (for example, clinical trial software) counts as technology. Staffing firms count as professional services unless the posting names the client’s industry. Verizon’s role appears twice in the data (once reposted by a job board), so the industrial row has seven postings and six employers. The technology row has 26 postings from 24 named employers, because GitLab posted two roles and one posting did not name its employer. Employer counts add to 65.

Technology companies lead because many sell AI features to enterprise buyers, and their postings tie the role to the company’s own certification or audit program. GitLab’s Senior Security Risk Engineer posting asks the hire to own AI impact assessments, AI risk assessments and risk treatment “to support ISO 42001 certification”. Cvent’s posting asks for support of “the ISO 42001 audit process end-to-end”.

Financial firms name the standard next to other frameworks: 12 of their 13 postings also named a NIST framework, and three cited the SR 11-7 model risk guidance. Consultancies name it because they assess client readiness. Kroll’s posting lists assessing clients “against frameworks such as NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001”.

Which Roles and Levels Ask for ISO/IEC 42001?

GRC, risk and engineering roles carry most ISO/IEC 42001 demand. Engineering roles are the most likely to name it: of 18 engineering and architecture postings in the index, 13 (72%) named the standard, against 1 of 20 counsel roles.

Share of US AI governance postings naming ISO/IEC 42001 by role family: engineering and architecture 72% (13 of 18), audit and assurance 45% (5 of 11), risk and model risk 45% (18 of 40), GRC, compliance and AI governance 43% (21 of 49), product and program 33% (2 of 6), data governance 32% (6 of 19), privacy 31% (5 of 16), legal and privacy counsel 5% (1 of 20)

Role familyAll postingsName ISO/IEC 42001Share of the family
GRC, compliance and AI governance492143%
Risk and model risk401845%
Engineering and architecture181372%
Data governance19632%
Audit and assurance11545%
Privacy16531%
Product and program6233%
Legal and privacy counsel2015%
LevelAll postingsName ISO/IEC 42001Share of the level
Analyst, specialist, engineer or associate502142%
Senior individual contributor231357%
Manager, lead, principal or staff632844%
Director and associate director22523%
VP, head, chief or executive director21419%

Source: AI Training Skool AI Governance Pay Index, 179 US postings. Level and role family come from the job title.

Titles hide most of this demand. Only 31 of the 71 postings (44%) put “AI” or “RAI” in the job title; the rest read as GRC engineer, security risk engineer, technology auditor or compliance manager. The duties these roles share are decoded in AI governance officer duties in real US postings.

Postings that named the standard had a $168,000 median advertised midpoint, against $169,000 for those that did not. The standard defines the work, not the pay. Pay by level, role family and state is set out in what AI governance roles pay in the US.

What Employers Want You to Do With ISO/IEC 42001

In 29 of the 71 postings, ISO/IEC 42001 is part of the work itself: running the employer’s own certification, advising clients, or aligning controls to the standard. In the other 42 it is knowledge the employer requires or would like.

How the posting uses ISO/IEC 42001PostingsExample from a posting
Run or support the employer’s own ISO/IEC 42001 certification, audit or compliance program11GitLab, Cvent, Doppel, Baylor Genetics, Vasion
Advise clients on ISO/IEC 42001 readiness4Crowe, Kroll, Cyclotron, World Bank Group
Align controls, map frameworks or track the standard as a named duty14Verizon, Moody’s, WesBanco Bank, Victaulic
Required knowledge or experience in the qualifications19Blue Yonder, Mizuho, Salesforce, Hitachi High-Tech America
Preferred, “a plus” or “nice to have”22Cisco, Dentsu, Palo Alto Networks, Bank of America
Something an intern will learn1Oceaneering

Source: AI Training Skool reading of the 71 postings. Each posting is counted once, under its strongest use of the standard.

Lead Implementer and Lead Auditor Wording in US Postings

Only 3 of the 71 postings named an ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer or Lead Auditor certification, all as preferred: Nova Southeastern University, Kroll and one compliance-software vendor. Six named an ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer or Lead Auditor credential instead, a sign that many of these teams grew out of information security programs.

If you are weighing a credential, read what a Lead Implementer certificate covers under ISO/IEC 42001. The AIGP, CISSP and CRISC appear more often in these ads, and AI governance certifications compared sets them side by side.

Do ISO 42001 Certified Companies Hire for It?

Some do. Three of the companies on our list of US organizations reporting ISO/IEC 42001 certification posted ISO 42001-naming roles in this window: Salesforce, ServiceNow (for its Moveworks unit) and Doppel. The others in the 40-company list are in a sourced list of ISO 42001 certified companies.

Other postings show employers working toward a certificate or keeping one. Vasion’s mentions “ISO 42001 certification maintenance”, and Cvent’s asks for AI management system artifacts “required for ISO 42001 certification and ongoing surveillance audits”. ButterflyMX’s asks the hire to scope “a readiness path for ISO 42001”.

Before you name a company’s certificate in an interview, check it. The ISO Help Centre notes that ISO itself does not perform certification and points to IAF CertSearch, a database of accredited certificates. IAF itself was succeeded by Global Accreditation Cooperation on 1 January 2026, and the database still carries the IAF name.

Where the ISO 42001 Jobs Are: States and Remote Share

California and New York had the most ISO/IEC 42001-naming postings (eight each), followed by Virginia (six) and Texas (five). One in five of these roles (14 of 71) was remote, a higher share than the 16% across all AI governance postings in the index.

StatePostings naming ISO/IEC 42001All AI governance postings in the indexShare naming the standard
California82040%
New York81942%
Virginia61250%
Texas51338%
Florida4667%
North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Illinois2 each7, 4, 4, 3Mixed
District of Columbia1911%
12 other states1 eachNot shownNot shown
Remote142850%
Location not stated5Not shownNot shown

Source: AI Training Skool AI Governance Pay Index, US Indeed postings. Virginia’s six include the Verizon role counted twice.

Washington, DC is the outlier: nine AI governance postings, but only one named ISO/IEC 42001. If you live outside the large hubs, the remote row matters most, because half of the remote AI governance roles in our data named the standard.

What Else ISO 42001 Postings Ask For

ISO/IEC 42001 rarely travels alone in a posting. Nearly three in four of these postings (73%) also named the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and more than half named ISO/IEC 27001.

Also named in the postingShare of the 71 ISO/IEC 42001 postingsShare of the 108 other postings
NIST AI Risk Management Framework73% (52)18% (19)
ISO/IEC 2700154% (38)9% (10)
SOC 245% (32)7% (8)
CISSP45% (32)15% (16)
GDPR44% (31)21% (23)
EU AI Act42% (30)9% (10)
CRISC35% (25)10% (11)
CISM34% (24)10% (11)
HIPAA30% (21)10% (11)
NIST Cybersecurity Framework28% (20)6% (6)
CIPP (any)27% (19)15% (16)
PCI DSS23% (16)2% (2)
AIGP20% (14)9% (10)
ISO/IEC 2770114% (10)1% (1)
OWASP AI security guidance (mostly the Top 10 for LLM Applications)14% (10)0%

Source: AI Training Skool AI Governance Pay Index. We did not count CISA, because the same letters name the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and our check found the agency in at least two postings.

In practice, an ISO/IEC 42001 posting is usually a security GRC posting with AI added. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework, released on 26 January 2023 for voluntary use, is the most common companion, so learn to map between the two.

If ISO/IEC 42001 is the line you cannot yet show on your resume, our ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer training for people applying to these roles costs US$795, awards 32 CPD hours and includes two exam attempts.

State AI laws barely show up. No posting in the 179 named Texas’s Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, which took effect on 1 January 2026, and only one named Colorado’s AI law. For background, see the overview of regulation of artificial intelligence in the United States.

How to Search Job Boards for ISO 42001 Roles Yourself

Search the number, not the title. In our data, 47 of the 71 postings wrote “ISO 42001” and 24 wrote “ISO/IEC 42001”, some inside lists such as “ISO 27001/27017/27018/42001”. A search for “42001” alone catches all of them. Queries that worked on the employment websites we used:

  1. “42001” on its own, set to the US or to remote, sorted by date.
  2. “42001” plus a family word: “42001 GRC”, “42001 risk”, “42001 audit” or “42001 privacy”. This finds the 40 of 71 roles without “AI” in the title.
  3. “AI management system”, which appeared, spelled out or as the acronym AIMS, in 7 of the 71 postings and in none of the others.
  4. Company career pages: check the employers in the table above and the certified companies every few weeks.

Set alerts on queries 1 and 2. If you do not yet have the experience these ads ask for, start with getting into AI governance without direct experience.

Is Demand for ISO 42001 Skills Growing?

One snapshot cannot show a trend. It does show breadth: 65 named employers across seven sectors and 21 states plus DC asked for the standard in about two months of postings. Government projections for the feeder jobs point up. The BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook projects employment of information security analysts to grow 21% from 2025 to 2035, with a $129,180 median in May 2025. Many security GRC teams hire from that occupation.

The routes into these roles, by background, are mapped in AI governance careers for US professionals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which Companies Hire for ISO 42001 Skills in the US?

In our October 2026 Pay Index, 65 named US employers listed ISO/IEC 42001 in AI governance job postings. They include Bank of America, Cisco, Salesforce, Verizon, Palo Alto Networks, Moody’s, Mizuho, Kroll and Crowe. Technology companies posted 26 of the 71 roles, financial services 13 and professional services 13.

What Jobs Ask for ISO/IEC 42001?

GRC, risk and security engineering roles ask for ISO/IEC 42001 most. In our data, 21 of the 71 postings naming it were GRC and compliance roles, 18 were risk roles and 13 were engineering and architecture roles. Typical titles were GRC Engineer, AI Risk and Governance Lead, Technology Auditor and Senior Security Risk Engineer.

Do Employers Require an ISO 42001 Lead Implementer Certification?

Rarely. Only 3 of 71 US postings naming ISO/IEC 42001 asked for an ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer or Lead Auditor credential, and all three listed it as preferred. Employers screen for the skill: 29 postings put the standard in the duties, and 19 listed knowledge of it as a requirement.

Are ISO 42001 Jobs Remote?

Some are. In our data, 14 of the 71 US postings naming ISO/IEC 42001 (20%) were remote, compared with 16% of all 179 AI governance postings in the index. Remote employers included GitLab, Sysdig, Deepgram and Granicus. Half of all remote AI governance postings named the standard.

Which Industries Need ISO 42001 Skills?

Technology and software companies posted 37% of the ISO/IEC 42001-naming roles in our data. Financial services and professional services each posted 18%. Healthcare, industrial, consumer and public-sector employers made up the rest.

Share it :
About the Author

Latha Karthigaa

Head of AI Governance at the Global AI Certification Council (GAICC)

A PhD-qualified AI governance leader in Software Engineering from the University of Auckland, she brings hands-on experience founding and exiting AI companies, and leading real-world AI solutions for finance and legal firms across the USA, UK, Australia, and New Zealand, combining governance, risk, compliance, and commercial expertise.

ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer

Related Reading

ISO/IEC 42001

An AI governance certification is a personal credential, earned by passing an exam, that shows you

October 14, 2026 | 8 min read
ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 on iso.org, published 18 December 2023, contains no templates: it states requirements and leaves

October 14, 2026 | 8 min read
ISO/IEC 42001

In our worked example for a fictional 200-person US SaaS company, the certification body’s fee is

October 14, 2026 | 8 min read